Climate change
August 27, 2024
Re: Climate change. Tony Hladun’s closing remark “Don’t count on governments to be responsible so show restraint and prepare for upcoming difficulties,” is very insightful. Sort of like one of the three biggest lies in the world “I’m from the government…here to help you.”
Political and religious leaders totally ignored the computerized projections (populated with the best available statistics from the World Health Organization, the Food and Agricultural Organization plus national databases) published by the scientists at MIT led by Dennis Meadows some 50 plus years ago. They predicted a massive global population decline in the latter part of the 21st century which will most probably lead to or be the result of…droughts, famines, wars, pandemics, shortages of water and essential non-renewable resources, etc. Does anyone see a pattern developing lately? Their predictions of climate change in the early 1970s and its impacts have been incredibly accurate.
Unfortunately, politicos disregarded their predictions and, as a result, nations are probably about 20 years PAST the tipping point of being able to reverse the combined impacts overpopulation, unchecked pollution, depletion of non-renewable natural resources, climate change, impending fresh water shortages and the like.
Boondoggle measures such as the carbon tax, carbon capture, fully electric vehicles and other non-scientific solutions are put forth as assurances to the public that climate change is “being dealt with.” At best, these measures will only slow the pace of climate degradation. In actual fact, nothing could be further from the truth.
Starting some 50 years ago, many common sense science-based and engineering and relatively low cost (when compared to recent billion dollar plus insurance claims) alternative holistic solutions should have been considered; for example, stationary thermal generation plants should have had Venturi scrubbers to remove 98 per cent of noxious emissions (e.g. 20,000 ppm of CO2 in stack gases reduced to about 400 ppm), since transportation accounts for about 85 per cent of climate change emissions, rail lines should have been doubled to take thousands of long haul truckers off the highways, branch railway lines should not have been abandoned, engine sizes could have been limited to approximately two litres (a two litre engine produces about half the pollutant load of a four litre engine), adopt alternate energy sources based upon European experience, etc.
To ensure our grandchildren enjoy a stable future…consider supporting any initiative that truly combats climate change and don’t be misled by boondoggles.
Lynn Clark,
Camrose
Re: Climate change. Tony Hladun’s closing remark “Don’t count on governments to be responsible so show restraint and prepare for upcoming difficulties,” is very insightful. Sort of like one of the three biggest lies in the world “I’m from the government…here to help you.”
Political and religious leaders totally ignored the computerized projections (populated with the best available statistics from the World Health Organization, the Food and Agricultural Organization plus national databases) published by the scientists at MIT led by Dennis Meadows some 50 plus years ago. They predicted a massive global population decline in the latter part of the 21st century which will most probably lead to or be the result of…droughts, famines, wars, pandemics, shortages of water and essential non-renewable resources, etc. Does anyone see a pattern developing lately? Their predictions of climate change in the early 1970s and its impacts have been incredibly accurate.
Unfortunately, politicos disregarded their predictions and, as a result, nations are probably about 20 years PAST the tipping point of being able to reverse the combined impacts overpopulation, unchecked pollution, depletion of non-renewable natural resources, climate change, impending fresh water shortages and the like.
Boondoggle measures such as the carbon tax, carbon capture, fully electric vehicles and other non-scientific solutions are put forth as assurances to the public that climate change is “being dealt with.” At best, these measures will only slow the pace of climate degradation. In actual fact, nothing could be further from the truth.
Starting some 50 years ago, many common sense science-based and engineering and relatively low cost (when compared to recent billion dollar plus insurance claims) alternative holistic solutions should have been considered; for example, stationary thermal generation plants should have had Venturi scrubbers to remove 98 per cent of noxious emissions (e.g. 20,000 ppm of CO2 in stack gases reduced to about 400 ppm), since transportation accounts for about 85 per cent of climate change emissions, rail lines should have been doubled to take thousands of long haul truckers off the highways, branch railway lines should not have been abandoned, engine sizes could have been limited to approximately two litres (a two litre engine produces about half the pollutant load of a four litre engine), adopt alternate energy sources based upon European experience, etc.
To ensure our grandchildren enjoy a stable future…consider supporting any initiative that truly combats climate change and don’t be misled by boondoggles.
Lynn Clark,
Camrose