February 10, 2026

I read an article on January 20, by Joe Vamer, who wrote that praising Beijing’s “new world order” is a costly misstep for Carney and Canada. Vamer stated in his article, “When a Canadian prime minister praises the idea of a ‘new world order’ while sitting in China, he is not engaging in neutral diplomacy.

“He is endorsing language that carries an extremely specific meaning in Beijing. In the Chinese strategic doctrine, a ‘new world order’ is not about reforming globalization. Its real objective is to replace American power and to weaken western alliances and replacing Liberal norms with a hierarchical system built on state control and non interference that shields authoritarian rule.”

This is not good for Canada. Most Canadians are clueless of what this man is doing to our country. This is just something for all of you to think about.

Lorne Vanderwoude,
Camrose

February 10, 2026

In his recent column, MP Pierre Poilievre rightfully highlighted the frustration rural Albertans feel regarding the CFIA’s proposed amendments to livestock traceability. As someone from New Norway who values the “land and legacy” of our agricultural sector, I share the concern over any “administrative nightmare” that puts red tape ahead of ranching.

However, a critical piece of data was missing from that column: The federation actually worked.
On January 10, 2026, following a massive pushback from 600 producers at a meeting in Innisfail, the CFIA officially announced a pause on the publication of these amendments to allow for deeper consultation. This is a significant victory for the livestock industry, yet it was omitted in favour of a “dog whistle” narrative that suggests we are helpless against Ottawa.

We don’t need more rage-farming; we need pragmatic solutions. While federal Conservative slogans call for “scrapping” traceability, those of us who live a conservative lifestyle know that robust traceability is what secures our billion-dollar access to global markets. Without it, one sick animal could lock out Alberta beef overnight.

The real solution isn’t to leave Canada or simply shout at it. The solution is for a pragmatic provincial government to step up. If federal health standards require expensive digital tags and scanners, the Province should provide the grants and technology to ensure our producers can comply without a financial burden.

We need to move past the “soap opera” of separatism and slogans. It is time for a “Progressive” approach to conservatism that protects the rancher’s wallet while securing the industry’s future. Alberta is “Forever Canadian”, not because we are weak, but because we are strong enough to speak up, hit the pause button, and change the rules to work for us.

Darlene Jacobsen,
New Norway

February 10, 2026

It seems that every other week there is a letter stating that Alberta would be better off economically if we separated from Canada. The separatists are just plain wrong. The British people were also told that they would be better off if they separated from the European Union. They were misinformed and are now a poorer country for their mistake. Alberta separatists like to point to the equalization payments that go to Quebec, conveniently overlooking the fact that Quebec was a “have” province until talk of separation turned Quebec into a “have not” province.

In July, University of Calgary economist Trevor Tombe wrote an article first published in The Hub called “A separate Alberta would be a poorer Alberta.” His reasons are too numerous for this letter. I urge you to find the article for yourself. He concludes that separating would hurt all of Canada, but hurt Alberta the most. He calculates that an independent Alberta would be $20 billion/year poorer. Put another way, separation would cost every Albertan $4,000 each year. Many people already struggle with affordability. We don’t need separatists to make it harder for us.

In May, the CEO of ATCO Nancy Southern stated that just the talk of separating was already driving investment out of Alberta. Imagine how much harm a divisive petition campaign, or even worse, a referendum campaign, would do. Alberta separatism makes no sense, but there is a small segment of Albertans who will simply not accept facts. We need our political leaders to put an end to this nonsense before the separatists do any more damage to Alberta. All the Alberta government has to do is point to the success of the Forever Canadian petition and pass a motion in the legislature stating that the issue is closed – we are staying in Canada. Done, and we move on to issues that matter.

Rob Hill,
Camrose

February 3, 2026

We would like to publicly acknowledge and thank the Camrose lawyers who sent the open letter to The Booster. As the lawyers pointed out, we are living in unprecedented times where the provincial government rewrites rules and legislation as it suits them. The UCP have stripped powers from the Chief Electoral Officer so they can no longer check on government overreach. Premier Smith has invoked the Notwithstanding Clause multiple times, overriding individual rights and freedoms. In addition, the government has taken powers away from the Law Society of Alberta to hold the Justice Minister accountable all the while criticizing our courts and trying to undermine their legitimacy.

These actions by the provincial government are more than unacceptable – they are dangerous. We need a government that represents the people and protects our rights. The government’s job is to work for the people, something Premier Smith and the UCP seem to have forgotten.

Thank you to the lawyers for your courage and your call for citizens to take up the cause and let this government know we will not stand idly by while democracy is dismantled. We citizens endorse your letter and share your concerns and call for action.

D’Arcy and Jane Arial
Emily Coykendall
Lawrence and Denise Dufresne
Paula Marentette
Janet McGeer
Treva and John Olson
Tim and Ellen Parker
Maya Rathnavalu
Larry and Margaret Rathnavalu
Don and Marie Ruzicka
Nola Sharp
Craig Wentland,
Camrose

February 3, 2026

Recent events in the U.S. with ICE agents rounding up suspected illegals (denounced by neighbours) who are using unprecedented and excessive force is reminiscent of Hitler’s Brownshirts rounding up Jews in Germany in the 1930s. Two quotes come to mind...

‘‘We should always be aware that what now lies in the past once lay in the future.” – Historian F.W. Maitland (1850-1906).

 “First, they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out – because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out – because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me – and there was no one left to speak for me.” – Clergyman Martin Niemöller (1892-1984)

Hitler’s Propaganda Minister Goebbels and Homeland Security Advisor Stephen Miller had both scapegoated an identifiable group based upon populist bigotry using disinformation to wage a propaganda campaign. Goering, Heydrich and Himmler concocted and implemented the Final Solution and Holocaust; the cabal of Border Czar Homan, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, et. al. are using similar procedures and propaganda,  hopefully with lesser consequences.
Hitler’s Foreign Minister Von Ribbentrop planned the invasion of a host of European countries and ultimately, betrayed Russia; is Marco Rubio, Secretary of State, a current back-channel envoy for the ‘‘western hemisphere of influence” Project 2025 plan between Trump and Putin to, ultimately, betray Canada? It is becoming increasingly evident that the Helsinki Summit in 2018 was the first step in Trump’s subterfuge to get out of NATO, seek revenge on Ukrainian officials, and develop alliances to support his personal quest to become the dictator of the West.

Is U.S. Attorney General Bondi’s legal advice to Trump merely subterfuge to find ways and means to legitimize Trump’s insatiable desire for power, perhaps following the playbook of Mein Kampf? Is what we are observing in Minnesota the U.S. modern version of Kristallnacht as the U.S. begins its descent into anarchy?

Thankfully, we have world leaders (and hopefully American voters) that have taken Niemöller’s warnings to heart and are ‘‘speaking out” and taking action.

Lynn Clark,
Camrose 

February 3, 2026

A few points to consider before we cast a vote for separation. First of all, what type of monetary system would we adopt? And what is the basis for the monetary gold or, heaven forbid, Bitcoin? If we lost the Canadian dollar, what would your assets be worth? How much would we stand to lose and we have to revive everything? Would the big banks still issue loans and mortgages in Canadian dollars? Or would Alberta not have access to Canadian dollars?
Our Canadian passports would no longer be valid anywhere in the world. Who would fund our new post office that we would require? Who would fund the Trans Canada, Yellowhead Highways, the federal parks, and our current police force? The RCMP would be gone (also thanks to Danielle Smith). Who would fund the international airports? What would happen to the federal full-time jobs? Those would be eliminated. Yes, we give many, in fact, several billion dollars in equalization payments to the poorer provinces, but we are supposedly making many more billions from resources, so if this is true, why is Alberta $82.9 billion in debt? A debt that is growing day by day.

Have we forgotten the billions we receive back from Ottawa for healthcare, education, sports, policing? Should we see another weather disaster, guess what? No military to help out. The railways are also under federal jurisdiction, so would they be compelled to haul our grain, coal and oil? I hear every day that we have no say in the federal politics because every election held is over when it reaches the Manitoba border. Well, people, guess where the population is? Yep! Quebec and Ontario, that is who dictates who goes into power.

Don’t forget that Conservatives have been voted in numerous times. We really have a lot to lose, so let’s think about the dire consequences of voting to separate.

Louis Hagel,
Camrose

January 27, 2026

The constitutional makeup of Canada is not designed for unity. Unity is comprised of fairness and balance. Out of the 343 seats in the House of Commons, Quebec and Ontario have 200. The remaining 143 seats come from the rest of Canada. This gives these two provinces the power to direct the affairs of Canada regardless of what political party forms the government.

Presently, this power is used to stifle the creation of wealth in Alberta while extracting 20 billion dollars a year in transfer payments. This does not inspire unity. It ferments the exact opposite. Those who support the continuation of such a system embrace unfairness and imbalance. The imbalance in the Canadian power structure could be rectified by reforming the Senate  – giving each province an elected, equal and effective voice. This would balance representation by population in the House of Commons. There is no interest in Ottawa in addressing the imbalance existing within our Constitution.

History demonstrates the human spirit strives for fairness and balance and ultimately will not be denied. Therefore, independence is a beckoning alternative.

Jack Ramsay,
Camrose

January 27, 2026

I would like to thank the Camrose lawyers who expressed their concerns about the actions of our provincial Government. There is an old protest slogan that says “Democracy Dies in Silence.” So it is time for me to come forward to voice my concerns about our UCP Government. To the concerns of the lawyers who wrote the letter I would like to add my concerns:

 A health care system in complete disarray that is failing to meet the needs of the citizens. Reduced and insufficient funding for education at all levels. Reduced support and outright attacks on the most vulnerable members of our community. Reducing or eliminating environmental regulations. Placing restrictions on renewable energy not imposed on the oil and gas industry.

However, my biggest concern is a government that seems to be open to Alberta separating from Canada – maybe not in words, but certainly in actions. The Alberta Separation movement should not be taken lightly. For the vast majority of Albertans who don’t support separation, it is our responsibility and duty to speak up.

I am calling on our MLA Jackie Lovely to publicly commit to Alberta remaining in Canada and to correct the misinformation being put forward by those who would see Alberta leave Canada. I will take your silence and the silence of your government as a vote for separation. I will not be silent in my support for Alberta and Canada.

Bill Sears,
Camrose

January 27, 2026

In a time when we hear horror stories of long waits, lack of help and service in our emergency departments all across the country and alarming results leaving families disillusioned and heartbroken, I had my own experience on January 16 in St. Mary’s Hospital’s Emergency Room (ER).

I arrived at the ER in distress and nervous, unable to get a good breath, I was attended to within five minutes of arriving. The triage nurse did her thing and I was in a room and in a bed post haste. I was seen by a doctor who was kind, patient and efficient. Tests were done and I was hooked up to a monitor that determined I was experiencing atrial fibrillation. Then followed blood work, ECG, CT scan, x-ray and more doctor’s attention. All the time I received kindness, reassurance and humour to ease the tensions.

Finally at 2:00 a.m. on January 17, Dr. Enias Mabhegedhe explained to me the decision was made to “shock” my heart back to a steady beat. He did this with exceptional patience and care. Within minutes, my errant heart was beating at a steady 67. I was later discharged with follow-up instructions. Within 24 hours, I was tended to, listened to and fixed.

To all the doctors, nurses, techs, cleaning staff and food preps at the hospital, a very big thank you from my grateful and, again, steady heart.

Wendy Hamer,
Camrose

January 27, 2026

I was born and raised in Alberta and have lived in Alberta for 58 of my 73 years. I own some shares in Suncor and TC Energy and South Bow Corp and stand to benefit from a coastal pipeline.
But I must take exception to the column – it is typical political claptrap.

He phrased his wording about a potential Pipeline to the Pacific carefully and ignored the other three projects in the MOU – the Pathways Project, nuclear generation of thousands of megawatts of Al computing power and the large transmission interties with B.C. and Saskatchewan.

It is not the Federal Government’s job to BUILD the pipeline – their role is to FACILITATE its construction. He must have missed the “private sector constructed and financed” detail. Did he even read the entire MOU?

I assume the “massive carbon tax” he refers to is the industrial carbon pricing of $130/tonne under Alberta’s TIER system  to which both Alberta and the Federal governments agreed.

He mentions “shovels in the ground” but there is no principal owner/operator, no design, no route, no budget, no schedule, etc., etc. He has no constructive suggestions to overcome the opposition to the pipeline from the province of BC, the Indigenous population, and the coastal fishermen/fisherwomen.

The MOU goes on to list eight Commitments made by Alberta, 11 commitments made by Canada and 17 joint commitments. The MOU ends with a section on an Implementation Committee responsible for delivering seven outcomes – four of them on or before April 1, 2026. Time’s a ticking. I would encourage people to read the MOU for themselves.

Don Cherkas,
Camrose

January 20, 2026

Your readers may recall that I shared a copy of my recent letter to Jackie Lovely, Camrose MLA, regarding the concerning state of health care in Alberta as a letter-to-the-editor in the January 13 edition of The Camrose Booster.

I did hear back from the MLA’s office – and in a rather timely way, too! However, it was Ms. Lovely’s assistant who responded, primarily referencing the government’s Acute Care Action Plan, which includes, quoted below:

Adding more than 1,000 new acute care beds in Edmonton and Calgary, including 700 new beds in Edmonton (350 each at the Misericordia and Grey Nuns hospitals).

Funding 50,000 additional surgeries to reduce wait times.

Increasing community and psychiatric care spaces.
Implementing a provincial neonatal intensive care strategy to support vulnerable infants.

Advancing a six‑priority framework focused on long‑term capital planning, workforce sustainability, and increasing flexibility for healthcare professionals.

I read the response several times, but couldn’t uncover many (any?) helpful details regarding the plan. A very partial breakdown regarding those 1,000 new beds is provided, but without a timeline. (I have since been told that these are probably not really new beds insofar as the government may, in fact, be reinstating 1,000 beds previously cut. I need to fact-check that one.)

Moreover, the response did not address my concern regarding how the addition of private health care within our public system will improve patient access and care rather than worsen it. I note mention of “increasing flexibility for healthcare professionals,” but am unsure of what that actually means. I suspect it is a veiled reference to previous announcements regarding private provision, and remain deeply worried that “increased flexibility” will result in increased pressure on our health-care professionals to work more, resulting in more burn-out. Exactly how will this “increased flexibility” improve patient care? Details, please, preferably backed by research.  In fact, what we really need if we are serious about patient care and preventing burn-out, is an increase in the number of health-care professionals and significant improvements in their working conditions.

We need to keep the conversation going, and continue sharing our concerns with each other and with the government. With that in mind, I encourage readers to contact the MLA’s office and also to attend the Friends of Medicare presentation with Dr. Paul Parks on Thursday, February 19, at 7:00 p.m., at the Jeanne and Peter Lougheed Centre for the Performing Arts.  Please Google as you need to register, although there is no cost.

Margaret Holliston,
Camrose

January 20, 2026

I read an article in the National Post, which came out in the January 15, 2026 edition, that Mark Carney didn’t meet with “Coastal First Nations”. He met with an environmentalist group by the name.
Coastal First Nations is an activist group endorsed by just eight out of approximately 70 First Nations on the B.C. coast.

When will Canadians learn that the Liberals cannot be trusted with telling the truth? Is Carney  continuing his bad habit of not being honest with us Canadians?

Lorne Vanderwoude,
Camrose 

January 20, 2026

It was stated in Ms. Dee Patriquin’s letter, in regards to the federal transfer payments that “Alberta received $8,649 billion from the first two programs this year alone…” This amount does not make up for the years and years of fiscal unfairness and federal overreach.

To be clear: Albertans pay $60 billion in federal taxes annually. We get$27 billion back. Albertans ‘overpay’ in CPP at $3 billion a year and EI at $1 billion a year. It is a fact that right now, in this province, many educated young adults and youths cannot find a job. Owning a home for many is beyond their reach, and food banks are being accessed by middle-class families more than any other time in recent history.

At present our own federal government is allowing Bill C-69 to block our pipelines. Bill C-48 is a ‘west-only’ tanker ban and Bill-234 blocks our oil and gas and many businesses are still paying carbon tax.
Some people would argue that we are NOT land locked. I disagree. In 1904, Sir Clifford Sifton, minister of the interior of Canada, allocated Alberta as a subservient colony. Really??

We have been treated unfairly long enough! Something has to change. The Alberta Advantage has vanished. Let’s stand together for the future for our children and grandchildren.

Separation is not a dirty word, it is the only way to come out from under the pressure and injustice that is blocking us and our children’s future!

Who is with me?

Jacquie Munro,
Rosalind

January 13, 2026

In regard to the Community Bus on its many stops around the City and the safety of the bus and its passengers:

One of the stops is on 46 Avenue and 66 Street. Right now, it stops short of a busy intersection. Not only is there traffic off highways going north, or the traffic coming off the service road, it’s the traffic that turns off 66 Street to access, for the most part, Tim Hortons. To save a minute, they changed the route. The old stop was some fifty metres to the north at Peavy Mart, which is a lot better for the safety of all concerned. Also, where it stops now, there is an increase in upset drivers for stopping at the new location.

Also, some increase in signage on the back of the bus would be helpful. As a driver and one who rides the bus on occasion, I have noticed this issue.

Darrell Broen,
Camrose

January 13, 2026

Over the past few years, I have become increasingly worried about the declining state of health care in our province. I believe a large part of the problem rests with a shortage of physicians, especially family physicians. However, we also need other health care professionals, and we certainly need to invest more into public health care generally so that practicing in Alberta is appealing again.

After listening to CBC’s The Current the morning of January 6, I felt it was time to contact my MLA to express my concerns and request more information regarding our government’s plans with respect to health care. I share my letter, and will share any information I might receive when Ms. Lovely replies.

“Dear Ms. Lovely, as you may recall, I retired in July 2021 after spending over twenty years working with Camrose and District FCSS. Our paths crossed several times back then, and I continue to appreciate your support for FCSS programs, locally and across the province.

As a senior nearing 70 years of age, with a family history of heart issues, I am understandably concerned about health care in Alberta. I am shocked and saddened at the news that a man could die of a heart attack in a hospital emergency room having had to wait for a reported eight hours. I have high blood pressure; that could be me, one day. I fear others will have the same fate.

That said, I am slightly heartened on learning of the Premier’s recent announcement that the province will be investing in 1,000 hospital beds, which will ‘free up’ our hospital emergency rooms. CBC’s The Current referenced her announcement while covering the Edmonton death this morning. Unfortunately, CBC could not share details regarding these 1,000 beds, apparently because there are no details to share.

I would love to learn more about those 1,000 beds, and so decided to contact you. I respectfully ask you to provide the details regarding these promised beds. When? Where? Will Camrose see an increase in our emergency health care services?
Finally, on a related note, further details regarding the government’s plans to permit doctors to practice in both a public and a private capacity, at least in part to enhance accessibility, would also be appreciated. For example, what are the government’s plans to increase the number of doctors practicing in Alberta as a whole? What, specifically, will Alberta do within its broad jurisdictional capacity with regard to overall health care services and, especially, physician recruitment? What are the timelines, marketing strategies, indicators, educational supports (more university funding even), etc.? (Please focus on Alberta, as reference to the federal government is not really helpful in this regard.)

In other words, please also provide details as to how the transition to what is commonly called a “two-tiered” system will increase the physician numbers required to support such a system rather than undermine or decrease access to either public or private care. I am sure you will agree that permitting choice of practice does not, in itself, guarantee an increase in access. Yet we need increased access to prevent future tragedies like that emergency room death that is making the news.

Thank you for your attention. I look forward to hearing from you soon, and to sharing the detailed information you will provide in your response with my friends who are equally concerned about the future – their future – of health care in Alberta.

Margaret Holliston,
Camrose

January 13, 2026

This is a response to our MP Pierre Poilievre’s recent Facebook post congratulating U.S. President Donald Trump. It was truly embarrassing for the constituency and the Conservative Party of Canada to be congratulating the man who threatened Canada only a year ago with tariffs and annexation.
As ashamed as I am to be a constituent in your riding, I am glad that at least I have now seen where you stand before the next election.

Marnie Roberts,
Camrose

January 6, 2026

I live in the southwest corner of Camrose County, a few miles west of Bashaw. I am the third generation in my family to live and work on this land. We are currently in an appeal process for a proposed 20 acre data centre development on farm land near by. That is 20 acres of industrial machinery operating 24/7 near by peoples homes, families and livestock. The proposal is to use the heat generated by bit-coin mining computers to dry hay and grain in an adjacent facility. The County development office initially approved the project without consulting any residents in our area and we are lucky to have learned of it in time to meet the appeal deadline. The review meeting is at the beginning of January.

The company proposing the development is a multi-national organization with branches in Canada, the U.S.A, China, Korea, Japan and Taiwan. They are leasing the land for the proposed project from the Hutterite Colony near by who presumably deals with this company through the exporting of their grain commodities.

I spoke with the County development office and they provided no evidence of how this sort of development helps our community. As far as I can tell the only people benefiting are the shareholders in this massive, absentee company, that has no roots in our community and will feel none of the negative consequences, and the County getting whatever tax revenue this project develops. That is not a good enough reason for me.

Year by year our countryside becomes increasingly industrialized. An agricultural landscape should be a place where work and leisure coexist not a place to be mined for the profit of people in offices hundreds or thousands of miles away. I am not anti-industry but as someone who cares deeply for my home I am allowed some discretion in what that industry looks like. I encourage everyone to look into the effects these data centres have on human health and the health of our eco systems. There is a big push going on in Alberta to develop this industry and if we sleep through it, we could lose the beauty, health and peace of the places we live and work and raise our families.

Brennan Wierzba,
Camrose County

January 6, 2026

It is very hard to read and hear about someone who died while waiting for care at an Edmonton hospital. We, as people here in Camrose, are so fortunate to have such dedicated doctors and professional medical staff who keep us safe when we have to visit an emergency room. One thing which we do not have is a large population like Edmonton has.

Our emergency room has the same issue like the ones in the larger centres. The ones in the rural towns are struggling to keep their emergency rooms open. They also struggle to attract doctors. This is not just a provincial government problem but the Federal government also has some of the blame. Both levels of governments do have to work together to solve these problems. The amount of money is not the problem.

Management of how AHS handles the money is the issue. Public health only is not the solution. Mismanagement by government crown corporations is the problem. We need a balance of private health companies which are funded by the government and government run health agencies funded by the government to make this work.

This is just something to think about.

Lorne Vanderwoude,
Camrose

January 6, 2026

The recent letter downplays Alberta’s outsized contributions to Confederation while overstating federal benefits.

Alberta’s high incomes, fueled by energy, mean no equalization payments and far higher federal taxes paid than services received–net contributions of $15-27 billion annually in recent years, totalling over $244 billion from 2007 to 2022.

The $8.6 billion in Health and Social Transfers for 2025 to 2026 is standard per-capita funding; it doesn’t offset the massive outflow. Equalization is largely funded by high-contributors like Alberta.
Federal “support” via Trans Mountain came at huge taxpayer cost (over $34 billion) after years of policy delays that blocked market access.

Job losses in oil stem partly from federal carbon policies and regulations, while cost-of-living strains hit Alberta hardest.

Albertans subsidize the rest of Canada. When fiscal imbalances, blocked development, and provincial rights are ignored, separation deserves serious discussion. True cooperation demands reciprocity, not one-way transfers.

Paul McKinstry,
Kingman

December 30, 2025

Paul McKinstry’s recent letter to the editor prompted a fact check on his rationale for Alberta separation. First, federal transfer payments are based on federal taxes that fund three major transfer programs: the Canada Health Transfer, Canada Social Transfer, and Equalization. These programs support health care, social, education, and other programs under provincial control, and not ‘Vancouver condos.’ Alberta received $8.649 billion from the first two programs this year alone, based on federal data. Separation would require Albertans to replace that funding from a smaller population.

Alberta doesn’t receive equalization payments because our average provincial tax revenue is higher than the national average, which reflects our higher per capita income. Equalization tops up provinces below the national average. Our tax revenue from income tax and petroleum royalties puts us above the national average. In fact, Alberta now has the highest average individual income in Canada according to Alberta’s Economic dashboard, and income has increased steadily since 2021. On average, Albertans are benefiting under the existing system, but we’re experiencing cost-of-living increases that affect all Canadians.

Lastly, declines in petroleum employment link mostly to industry automation, not federal policy. Alberta’s oil production has increased from 2011, as have export sales helped by federal support for the TransMountain pipeline. Decarbonization, which the current federal budget supports, could add jobs. In contrast, provincial renewable energy policies have driven away investment. Times are changing at a global level, which affects the federal and provincial realities. Cooperation and innovation by all Canadians, not separation, are needed to build our future.

Dee Patriquin,
Camrose

December 30, 2025

He went straight to the point: “Your blood count has reached the threshold. You will start chemotherapy next week Thursday.” I was in shock. I recall thinking, “There must be some mistake. You’re likely reading someone else’s chart.” I protested that I could not start treatment that day due to a work commitment. So he allowed a one-day delay. I started the next Friday instead.

That was two years ago. I’ve just completed treatment number twenty-four. And the nurse at our local Cancer Clinic informed me that I’ve been assigned another twenty-four cycles – another two years worth of treatments. This is very good news. It means that my body has responded very positively to the medications and for the most part, my condition is stable.

So I’m writing this to express deep appreciation for the amazing care I have received through Alberta Health Services. I’m grateful for an observant family doctor who noticed that something was slightly ‘off’ in a routine blood test and referred me to the Cross Cancer Institute.

That resulted in the early detection of multiple myeloma – cancer of the bone marrow. The doctors and support staff at the CCI have been amazing. Even though they see thousands of patients each year, it feels like I’m the only one in their care. “My” oncologist-epidemiologist gave me his personal cell phone number and told me I could call him any time. Whenever we talk, our conversations are warm and personable. He asks me about my family and keeps me informed about his son’s speed skating career.

I am also very grateful for our local Cancer Clinic. Until my diagnosis, I had no idea how privileged Camrose-area cancer patients are. We have an amazing medical team right here at St. Mary’s Hospital. I receive my infusions and injections there, so no need to drive to Edmonton. When I attend the Clinic, it’s like walking on to the set of the ’90s TV series Friends. Everybody knows my name! If I have to wait for a few minutes, the hospital chaplain stops by to express his support.

In addition to being an out-patient, I spent several days as an in-patient at St. Mary’s Hospital. Despite a very busy day at the ER, the doctor listened attentively as I shared my story. When our visit was nearing completion, I thanked him for the time he spent with me. He replied, “That’s what I’m here for.” The care I received throughout my stay was superb.

And while I’m at it, I’ll add a comment about my brother’s experience. Just over a year ago, he had a heart attack. He was rushed by ground ambulance from Peace River to Grande Prairie and then transferred by air ambulance to the Cardiac Unit at the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Edmonton. He couldn’t say enough about the exceptional people who helped him achieve a full recovery.

Add to all of the above the incredible support from family and friends – especially the prayers of our tiny grandkids.

As Albertans, we have heard many concerns about AHS. I, for one, continue to be amazed and ever so grateful for what we have in our publicly funded health care system.

Brian Krushel,
Camrose

December 23, 2025

I’m writing to thank  The Camrose Booster for your efforts in the last two editions of your paper to encourage readers to shop locally. I really took notice when you listed the businesses (large corporations like Amazon and Wayfair) that were noticeably absent from the 2025 Kinsmen Radio Auction’s list of donors. Kudos to all of the local businesses who stepped up and made a donation so that the Kinsmen Club will be able to carry out their great work. We need to make sure that these businesses continue to survive and thrive as their support in our community is invaluable.

I understand that a city the size of Camrose may not be able to provide all the goods and services that we need (or think we need) but, when you look a little closer, it is very impressive to see what we can find locally. After reading your effective messaging, I was motivated to head to Main Street to buy a new case for my phone and received excellent service. I also stopped and bought some ‘made in Camrose’ Soap that I am excited to give to a friend this Christmas. And recently, on the recommendation of a sales person in a local store, I discovered a seamstress who was able to replace the zipper in my old favourite coat at a very reasonable price. Just think how if every shopper in Camrose and area were to make even a handful of extra local purchases that would add up to make a noticeable difference to the health of our economy.

I understand why your paper is called The Camrose “Booster”. Well done!

Mardell Olson,
Armena

December 23, 2025

The Carney government recently cut billions in funding global health, when we had already long fallen short in funding health aid around the world. Canadians’ typically rosy view of their generosity doesn’t fit the facts: Canada has always been at the bottom of the G7 in terms of aid funding.

It might seem pragmatic – when you’re in the economic hole you don’t give away money. But a good metaphor is living in a house with roommates, many ill with diseases like Ebola, Drug-resistant TB, and yellow fever. The house is full of moans and hacking coughs, but since you have your own bedroom and you feel fine, you don’t worry about what everyone else is dealing with. That you once caught COVID from them and it almost killed you, that’s history.

You say it’s too expensive to help your roommates? How much did COVID cost? Reducing funding for global health is like putting in earplugs so you don’t hear the coughs.

Nathaniel Poole,
Victoria, BC

December 23, 2025

It is poetic justice when someone gets hoisted on their own petard; the UCP Recall Act, estimated to cost taxpayers more than $10 million, allows eligible electors to petition to remove elected officials between elections. Autocratic, ideologically-driven bills like the Justice Statutes Amendment Act are a contradiction from a government that purports to favour small “hands off” government and one that listens to constituents.

Problematic MLAs? Just turf them at the next election by voting for competent MLAs that represent one’s beliefs and values. No referendum, Premier Smith; call an election.

It is important to remember that Justin Trudeau is gone, the Reform/Alliance cabal of Manning, Harper, Day, Poilievre, Kenney, Scheer, Ambrose, et al. accomplished nothing in advancing the interests of western Canada while they served in the House of Commons for two decades.

The central issue in the next provincial election is the capability and record of Alberta politicians … NOT misdirected anger at Federal Liberals/Ontario Conservatives/Quebec Bloc.

Sadly, Albertans must reconcile the angst of having to choose between the polar opposites of “too far left” and “too far right” on the provincial political spectrum. Hopefully, independent MLA Peter Guthrie, the leader of the Alberta Tory Party, can garner support as they align themselves with the centrist policies and fiscal accountability of Lougheed era Conservatives.

The anachronistic policies, fiscal mismanagement and cronyism of the UCP are mind boggling. Instead of much needed public inquiries, reports like the Wyant Report are currently withheld. Auditor General Doug Wylie has been stonewalled amid denials of wrongdoing by the UCP as investigations by the RCMP and Alberta’s Chief Electoral Office proceed with little or no cooperation by the UCP.

Smith’s agenda of dumping the RCMP and CCP comes directly from Preston Manning’s 20th century musings which were NOT part of the UCP’s pre-election platform.

Financial miscues, poor decisions, cronyism and questionable commitments total more than $20 billion that include investment losses at AIMCo, Keystone XL, meds from Türkiye, coal mine settlements, Sturgeon Refinery, DynaLIFE, overthrowing K-12 curriculum changes, excessive grants to MacEwan University and Charter Schools, Alberta Next panels, sinecure (do nothing) committees for cronies, COVID 19 spending, privatized health care plus research $$ to support a host of unproven environmental boondoggles.

Lynn Clark,
Camrose 

December 23, 2025

Floor crossing is not a new concept in Canadian politics. I see the trickling of Conservative MPs crossing the floor to join the Liberals. March 6, 2015, the Edmonton Journal reported the largest floor crossing by any opposition party in Canadian politics. Danielle Smith, along with eight MLAs, joined Jim Prentice for exchange of key roles in his government and enforcement of candidates in certain ridings. Now, in the election of that year, the NDP won crushing Jim Prentice’s Conservatives.

Now, if history does repeat itself, I wonder if the Liberals will be crushed by another party to win government. I am thinking of the Federal NDP party. This might sound impossible but it was impossible for the NDP to win here in Alberta but because of floor crossing allowed by the government, they just sealed their fate. Just wondering.

Lorne Vanderwoude,
Camrose

December 16, 2025

For the last few years we’ve been constantly hearing about the cost of housing and how it needs to be more affordable. The funny part about this is that the same people who caused the spike in housing valuations are the same people who say they have the solution. What a joke!

Think about it. The homeowner doesn’t want the value of his house to go down. He’s seen a 200 to 300 per cent increase  in value just since Covid started. The realtor doesn’t want the price to go down, because then so does their commission. The bank and CMC don’t want the house prices to go down because they would get less interest on the loans. The realtor blames the appraiser for the rise, but they’re both guilty of the inflationary rise in prices.

Since common sense says prices won’t come down, how do you make house prices affordable? When I was in the housing business in B.C., we convinced then Premier Bill Bennett to offer a one-time grant for new housing starts to first-time buyers, seniors and divorced people. CMHC then came out with a grant as well for the same people allowed to get it. It didn’t lower prices necessarily, although it did in the modular home industry. What it did was reduce the amount of money a purchaser needed to buy a house. It was a limited time offer, but it saw a huge amount of home purchases in a very short period of time.

In today’s market, if you use $350,000 as an average condo price in Camrose or Edmonton, and eliminated the GST for the purchasers and did a $5,000 provincial grant and a $5,000 federal grant, the estimated payment at 4.69 per cent would be approximately $1,920 per month according to the TD Bank mortgage calculator.

This amount is roughly what people are now paying in rent. The difference is, with the $10,000 federal and provincial grants, the down payment is cut in half.

What would be the biggest hurdles, you ask? Well, having both levels of government work together would be the first miracle required. Where would the funds come from? Start by cutting the cost of government via a reduction at both levels of government in the number of civil servants employed. Next would be to cut immigration and use those savings to provide the grant money at the federal level. There are many easy ways to fund this money. B.C. proved it during the Bill Bennett years. I’m sure to some this seems a fantasy, but nothing else is working and what I have stated has a proven track record and did work. What have we got to lose?

Ron Harder,
Camrose

December 16, 2025

The Liberal Minister of industry, Melanie Joly finally is agreeing to release the contract which the Federal government has with Giant Auto Stellantis.
In front of the special committee who was made up of members of parliament of different political parties, Joly claimed that Stellantis blocked certain parts of the contract to be released to the committee by their request.

Stellantis first of all refused to attend this special committee meeting but later wrote a letter stating that they never restricted anything from the committee. The question was asked what was the Liberal government hiding?

Now Melanie Joly has agreed to release the full document since it was clear that the contractor did not block anything from being released.

This certainly does question how honest this government is and whether Canadians should trust this government to lead our country.

Lorne Vanderwoude,
Camrose
 

December 16, 2025

Thank you, Canada Post Camrose, for making the Letters to Santa program extra special this year. My children were delighted to receive a response from Santa at record speed this year. When they opened their personalized envelops, there was glitter, snowflakes and stickers. Wow! Each letter had a fun little write up and a personalized PS message referring to their individual letters they sent in. They were blown away! Thank you for spreading a little extra Christmas magic this year.

Jane Beck,
Camrose

December 9, 2025

By signing the latest Memorandum of Understanding, Premier Smith has committed Alberta to a net-zero emissions target. Let’s look at some facts: Global CO2 emissions are approximately 40,000 megatonnes annually and they continue to increase. Since 1992, politicians have met and pledged to reduce carbon emissions but none of these promises have borne fruit. Countries, including Canada, have not met their targets and will probably not meet them in future. So Canada’s net-zero policy means we are trying to lead the world to a place it’s not going, and Canadians are being made to pay a price with nothing in return. In 2023, oil and gas production released 200 megatonnes of carbon, which is only 0.5 per cent of global emissions. So, even if we shut down all oil and gas activity (and freeze in the dark), we would have no real impact on global emissions. Believe it or not, the US leads the world in absolute CO2 emission reduction, and they are not focused on net-zero.

So with the MOU, let’s just look at one example and that’s the Pathways carbon capture project. This is a $16.5 billion (up to 60 per cent taxpayer money right now, but wait for the final numbers) project that will capture up to 12 megatonnes of CO2 that will be injected because CO2 has no commercial value other than as tax. That is only 0.04 per cent of global emissions, so it’s basically nothing. What else could $16.5 billion buy?  It could build housing, hospitals, schools and infrastructure. The average Canadian family spends about $17,500 annually on food so it could feed nearly a million families for a year.

So what should we do? Our politicians should set aside their ideology and grandstanding and do what is best for Canadians, and that is to stop trying to impress the rest of the world and to build a strong and resilient economy. We should look at the transition to alternate energy as an opportunity and not a punishment.  Impoverishing ourselves will not help - just look at the failure of British and German economies, our friends in net-zero. That said, when countries make realistic commitments that they meet, we should do our part. But we should not be leaders on the road to poverty.

Tony Hladun,
Camrose

December 9, 2025

This is a response to Jackie Lovely’s “Recall Petitions” column. I feel compelled to respond to this article and have lots to say but will contain it to two points.

Jackie states, “Recall legislation was introduced to remove elected officials for serious proven misconduct or sustained failure to represent local constituents” (emphasis added). I am curious if Ms. Lovely considers stripping Canadian citizens of their Charter rights an example of “serious proven misconduct” because forcing teachers back to work did just that-teachers do not have full Charter rights for five years thanks to the UCP legislation.

These are rights that are supposedly guaranteed by our constitution. To very poorly paraphrase Martin Niemöller, it doesn’t typically matter to people what happens until they come for YOU and impacts YOU directly.And it appears they are prepared to trample the rights of anyone if needed. Just watch.

She also states, “Misusing recalls risks undermining our democratic institutions and distracting from what matters most to Albertans” (emphasis added). At the recent UCP annual meeting they spent a lot of time talking about separation from Canada, taking more rights from vulnerable people like trans kids or people using AISH, a provincial police force, and banning third trimester abortions. My favourite was trumping up the MOU Danielle Smith signed with Ottawa to build a pipeline most people believe will never be built. Or travelling to Mar-a-Lago to hang out with the American version of themselves.

None of these things seem to be pressing issues for most Albertans when the cost of living is still most people’s priority. The problem the UCP will continue to face is an educated and vocal public. When the only weapon you legally have left is recall petitions, guess what?  You’re going to get recall petitions. I guess the other option would be to actually listen to your constituents instead of following a radical on the right.

Bob Jonson,
Camrose

December 9, 2025

The assessment that Premier Danielle Smith cannot possibly “win” all her simultaneous “culture wars” is a sound one, rooted in the political reality that she simply does not have enough political capital–public support, resources, or political goodwill–to fight every battle against every opponent she has created.

A government engaging in multiple, divisive conflicts–from federal relations, firearms legislation, and healthcare to social policies–strains its bandwidth and invites broad opposition. The list of groups arrayed against various UCP policies is extensive and includes:

The separatist wing: a unique and challenging “culture war” exists internally, where the UCP faces pressure from hardline separatist groups (like the Alberta Prosperity Project) and members within its own party. This faction views recent negotiations with Ottawa as concessions, creating an impossible dynamic of simultaneously fighting federal overreach and internal demands for outright separation. The Government of Canada, NDP, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, Amnesty International, legal experts and constitutional scholars, First Nations, such as the Onion Lake Cree Nation, gun control advocacy groups (PolySeSouvient, Coalition for Gun Control), healthcare advocates, doctors, and nurses, the education sector (teachers, parents, support workers), LGBTQ2S+ communities and advocates and various public interest and disability advocacy groups.

This broad coalition is fueled by a strategy that prioritizes ideological conflict over stable, inclusive governance. While a culture war energizes a political base, it alienates the moderate majority and drains necessary political capital for sustained success.

Ultimately, governance requires tangible outcomes that benefit all citizens. The current strategy risks voter fatigue and diverts attention from essential provincial responsibilities. When facing such widespread opposition across a spectrum of issues, a political victory on all fronts is an impossibility. Albertans deserve governance grounded in reality, not perpetual conflict.

Darlene Jacobsen,
New Norway

December 2, 2025

The Operation Christmas Child (OCC) Shoeboxes have been filled, and our hearts are full as well!  A BIG THANK YOU to each and everyone of you who helped pack over 1,800 shoeboxes in Camrose and area (that’s over 200 more shipped to Calgary than last year). That does not include shoeboxes shipped online because you still can order a box at packabox.ca until December 31.

Glenda Strauss and the OCC Team,
Camrose

December 2, 2025

Primary and Preventative Health Services Minister Adriana LaGrange said recently that the Alberta government is committed to “ensuring that under no circumstances will any Albertan ever have to pay out-of-pocket to see their family doctor or to get the medical treatment they need.”

How can she say that?!  Right now, (some) Albertans are paying out-of-pocket for medical treatments they need. If a second tier of private health care comes into existence, her claim won’t be true then, either. Insurance companies are (figuratively speaking) drooling over the possibility of providing coverage for health care.  Who will pay those insurance premiums? Albertans (those who can afford to buy insurance) will be paying those premiums out of pocket.

I am bamboozled by the government’s plan for staffing a private health-care system! The plan would allow medical staff in the public system, under certain circumstances, to practise in the private system. The public-system medical staff are already overworked (and underpaid, and under appreciated by the government)! How can a second health-care system be staffed by poaching from the first, which is already understaffed?!

A properly funded, competently administered, adequately staffed public health-care system does not need “help” from private health care. Let’s fix the problems with the public system and forget this whole private business.   Last I heard, the majority of Canadians/Albertans do not want privatized health care.

John Olson,
Camrose

December 2, 2025

What is happening to the United Conservatives when it comes to their recall legislation is in fact a repeat of what happened to the Social Credit in 1937. Bible Bill (William Aberhart) had become so unpopular that in his riding his fellow voters had collected enough signatures, which was 66.6 per cent of the voters, to force a by-election.

That was the number Aberhart had come up with. Before this could take place, the Social Credit Party quickly reversed the recall legislation so that the Premier would not be embarrassed. If that by-election would have gone ahead, the Premier would have lost that election. I do wonder if Danielle Smith will take a page out of William Aberhart’s play book on how to deal with a recall legislation going against their party, with 14 recall MLAs? Will this be another repeat of 1937?

Lorne Vanderwoude,
Camrose

November 25, 2025

Julie Girard is correct that mindless division helps no one, but history shows that peaceful border changes and political realignments – like the breakup of the Soviet Union – have often allowed like-minded people to govern themselves and live more peaceably with their neighbours than before.

Quebec’s decades of separation threats did create economic uncertainty, yet the ultimate result was simple: more federal money flowing from Alberta and the West into Quebec than ever before. Quebec never had the resource base to make good on its threats; Alberta does. That is the difference.

Canada’s federal system was designed in 1867 by and for Eastern Canada, and it still tilts eastward. What upsets Albertans is not that we send billions in net fiscal transfers every year (though we do), but that Ottawa and Quebec actively block the pipelines, plants, and resource projects that create the wealth we are then expected to share. It is one thing to ask for help; it is another to sabotage the helper.

No Alberta government  – Conservative, NDP or otherwise – has been blameless. Past leaders have sometimes spent recklessly or failed to diversify quickly enough. Fair criticism.

It remains unclear why Ms. Girard implied that more educational funding would quiet Alberta’s sovereignty concerns. Albertans of every educational background, from tradespeople to PhDs, can be found on both sides of the independence debate. The desire for a fair deal is not limited to any one level of formal schooling.

Independence would not “magically” boost pensions or slash taxes – it would do so directly, because $20–27 billion a year would stay home instead of vanishing into federal coffers. Pipelines would not appear overnight, but without Ottawa’s deliberate delays they could be approved and built years faster.

Finally, separation would not mean isolation. It would mean replacing a one-sided relationship with mutually respectful trade and energy agreements with provinces, states, and countries that want what we produce.

Real unity is built on fairness and respect, not perpetual subsidy plus sabotage. Until we get that inside Confederation, Albertans have every right to consider an alternate future.

Paul McKinstry
Kingman 

November 25, 2025

Paul McKinstry’s recent letter to the editor prompted a fact check on his rationale for Alberta separation. First, federal transfer payments are based on federal taxes that fund three major transfer programs: the Canada Health Transfer, Canada Social Transfer, and Equalization.

These programs support health care, social, education, and other programs under provincial control, and not “Vancouver condos”. Alberta received $8.649 billion from the first two programs this year alone, based on federal data. Separation would require Albertans to replace that funding from a smaller population.

Alberta doesn’t receive equalization payments because our average provincial tax revenue is higher than the national average, which reflects our higher per capita income. Equalization tops up provinces below the national average. As Trevor Tombe explained in The Globe and Mail (December 18, 2018), our tax revenue from income tax and petroleum royalties puts us above the national average.

In fact, Alberta now has the highest average individual income in Canada according to Alberta’s Economic Dashboard, and income has increased steadily since 2021. On average, Albertans are benefiting under the existing system, but we’re experiencing cost-of-living increases that affect all Canadians.

Lastly, declines in petroleum employment link mostly to industry automation, not federal policy (https://www.pembina.org/media-release/more-oil-gas-production-fewer-workers). Alberta’s oil production has increased from 2011, as have export sales (https://www.oilsandsmagazine.com/energy-statistics/alberta), helped by federal support for the TransMountain pipeline. Decarbonization, which the current federal budget supports, could add jobs. In contrast, provincial renewable energy policies have driven away investment. Times are changing at a global level, which affects the federal and provincial realities. Cooperation and innovation by all Canadians, not separation, are needed to build our future.

Dee Patriquin
Camrose 

November 18, 2025

We wanted to win tickets to see Scott Woods. We are seniors and find the price of entertainment is getting very expensive!

Thank you, Camrose Booster, so much for “drawing” our name to attend the show. It was an awesome show that we truly enjoyed! Thank you so much.

Michael and Judy Syvensky,
Camrose

November 18, 2025

I’m writing to share the story of a man many in our community may know–Shane Scarff–and to ask for compassion and action as he faces a heartbreaking housing challenge here in Camrose.

Shane has lived in Camrose for his entire life. As a single father for many years–he raised his now 19th year–old son in this community, working hard to provide stability, love, and a sense of belonging. He’s someone who has weathered life’s storms quietly and with determination–the kind of neighbor who shows what strength and perseverance truly look like.

Today, Shane is facing a reality no one should have to endure. Living as a paraplegic–with a permanent physical disability and using a wheelchair, he has been unable to find an accessible and affordable home in Camrose. His current housing is through Rose City Residential Support Services, a local organization that assists individuals with disabilities; however, his housing situation remains uncertain at the end of his current lease term. Without help, he could soon have nowhere safe to go.

This isn’t just Shane’s story–it’s a reflection of a growing need in our city. Camrose has always been known as a caring, inclusive community. But right now, we are facing a shortage of accessible housing that leaves residents with much uncertainty.

Shane deserves to remain in the city where he raised his son and built his life–close to his family, his supports, his medical care, and his sense of belonging. With modest financial or community assistance, a safe, permanent and accessible home could be found or adapted to meet his needs.

Camrose has a proud history of coming together for those in need. I believe we can do that again–for Shane, and for others who deserve the same sense of home and dignity we all hope for.

I sincerely urge our local leaders, landlords, and fellow residents to come together and find a solution. Let’s ensure Camrose continues to stand for compassion, dignity, and inclusion–and that no one is left without a safe place to call home.

Deiann Simpson,
Former Camrose resident

November 18, 2025

Paul McKinstry’s recent letter argues that Alberta’s future lies in separation. I disagree–strongly–and not because of nostalgia, but because history and evidence show that division has never improved the lives of ordinary people. Strong communities do that. Cooperation does that. Separation has repeatedly done the opposite.

We don’t need to speculate about the economic consequences of secession talk; Canada already lived through it. Decades of uncertainty around Quebec’s political future led to capital flight, stalled investment, downgraded credit ratings, and tens of thousands of jobs relocating to Ontario. Even talk of separation can destabilize a provincial economy, and economists across the spectrum agree that business investment depends on stability, predictability, and confidence in long-term rules–not constitutional brinkmanship.

Much of the anger in the separation discussion comes from misunderstandings about equalization. Equalization is not a punishment; it is a constitutionally established program (Constitution Act, 1982, s.36) designed to ensure all Canadians can access reasonably comparable public services no matter where they live. Payments go to people–not provinces–and revenue differences are calculated every year based on national economic data. The last major review of the formula was indeed undertaken by a Conservative federal government under Stephen Harper. Alberta does not “write a cheque” to Ottawa; Albertans simply pay federal taxes at the same rate as every Canadian, and the federal government redistributes based on relative fiscal capacity, not political favouritism.

If we are looking for the true sources of Alberta’s economic challenges, we should be honest: Alberta governments–of all political stripes–made long-term policy choices that allowed multinational energy corporations to extract tremendous wealth while leaving Albertans with limited savings, low royalties, and a Heritage Fund that never lived up to its promise. None of this was caused by Ottawa.

We should also acknowledge the profound harm caused by years of cuts and political hostility toward education. Strong educational institutions help citizens understand how Canada works, how policy is made, and how to engage constructively in national decisions. Undermining education makes it easier to blame Ottawa for every challenge and harder to build practical solutions here at home.
The idea that separation would magically boost pensions, slash taxes, build pipelines overnight, or solve structural economic issues ignores constitutional law, international trade realities, the complexity of disentangling a federation, and the decades of disruption Alberta would face. Independence movements elsewhere—from Quebec to Scotland to Catalonia—show that the cost of separation is far higher, the benefits far smaller, and the uncertainty far more destabilizing than advocates admit.

Alberta’s strength has never come from turning inward or cutting ourselves off. It has come from building communities, educating citizens, welcoming new ideas, and working collaboratively–even when we disagree.

Division won’t secure a future for our children. Building a resilient, educated, forward-looking Alberta within a stable Canada will.

Julie Girard,
Camrose

 

November 11, 2025

Alberta’s separation from Canada is not just prudent–it is a moral imperative for our children’s future. Yet too many of us remain shackled to a dying dream: the “old Canada”, where Ottawa seemed fair. That Canada is gone, replaced by a regime that bleeds us dry while mocking our values.

We still transfer $25 billion net annually to a federation that uses our money to buy Quebec’s votes and Vancouver’s condos.

Ottawa’s net-zero fanaticism has shuttered refineries, killed nearly 200,000 energy jobs since 2015, and turned Calgary skyscrapers into ghost towers. Our youth flee to Texas and Tennessee, where taxes are low and opportunity real. Here, they inherit waiting lists, tuition debt, and a carbon-taxed future.

The saddest sight? Retirees clutching their meager CPP/OAS cheques, terrified of change, willing to mortgage their grandchildren’s birthright for a few “secure” dollars today.  There is no reason why these deserved monies could not be increased in an independent and prosperous Alberta. The current pension cheques were built on Alberta oil, yet they vote to keep the boot on our neck.
Independence means keeping every dollar we earn, slashing income taxes 40 per cent, building pipelines in short order, not decades, and creating a $500-billion Heritage Fund that actually grows. We have the resources and the grit.

To the comfortable pensioner clutching yesterday: your nostalgia is betrayal. Alberta’s children deserve a country that fights for them–not one that sells them out.

It’s time to choose: a proud, prosperous Alberta, or a slow death in Carney’s (Trudeau’s) Canada.

Paul McKinstry
Kingman

November 11, 2025

Well, after a few days to recover from a heartbreaking Toronto Blue Jays World Series loss, I am now trying to conceptualize why I can become so invested in my favourite professional teams’ wins and losses (don’t get me started on the
Oilers). I am well aware that it is “just a game” and that my “life will go on” no matter what happens, but for some reason this playoff run felt different for me. As a child, by the time the Blue Jays had won in 1993, I had seen them win two World Series along with my Oilers winning five Stanley Cups. The Edmonton Eskimos were winning Grey Cups and I thought it was normal for “my team” to always win.  Fast forward over 30 years and I am sadly reminded on a yearly basis just how hard it is to win and the mental anguish that comes with being a sports fan.

This playoff run was different as I shared it with my children in a way that brought back memories of my own childhood. It is hard to describe the relationship that a father has with their children in sports. You watch them play the sports that they love and see the passion grow as they turn into young adults. You know it’s just a baseball game, but the hours spent together along the way are what are so memorable and special.  Core memories (Inside Out Disney reference) are often described by parents these days as being instrumental to a child’s development and reflecting on my own life, I can recall so many of those core memories with my family around sports (sitting on my Papa’s lap when Gretzky’s slap shot went over Vernon’s shoulder, or watching the Jays beat the Braves with my mom in 1992 and so on).

I wanted the Jays to win so badly–not for me but for my son who shed real tears of sadness and grief.  However, the memories and moments shared over the past few months that led to those tears are what made this season so special.  Here’s to next year and more core memories being made (or a disappointing last place finish all the same).

Chris Zarski,
Camrose

November 11, 2025

This year we were thrilled to welcome the biggest crowd yet to our Hallo-ween Haunted House–1,251 trick-or-treaters! It’s been an incredible five years of spooky fun and, after much thought, we’ve decided that this year was the last for us.

Creating eerie scenes, hearing the screams and laughter, and seeing the smiles of kids (and parents!) each Halloween has been an absolute blast. While we’ll still be around next year to hand out candy, we’ll be scaling things back and retiring the Haunted House.

We want to extend a huge thank you to everyone who has helped make this community tradition such a success, the amazing volunteers who helped bring our spooky visions to life, those who donated props and candy, those who made sure our volunteers were well fed and supported and those who donated to the food bank.

It’s been a frightfully fun ride, and we’re so grateful for the community’s enthusiasm and support year after year. Happy Halloween and thank you for the memories!

Tamara and Kim Kelly,
Camrose

November 11, 2025

Remembrance Day ceremonies will have a special meaning this year. I look forward to standing with my fellow Canadians in remembrance and with a thankful heart for our brave soldiers who have stood up and fought for freedom, democracy and peace.

I will listen with renewed attention to the poem “In Flanders Field” which places responsibility on citizens to take up the torch and hold it high. I always thought of this as a plea, but now I see it as a warning. We ignore this responsibility to take care of our democracy at our own peril.

The UCP government led by Danielle Smith has ignored their promises, along with the needs of citizens since their election. However, the most shocking and reprehensible action was the UCP decision to enact the notwithstanding clause in order to avoid negotiation with workers and, in addition, deny those workers the right to strike. Additionally, they impose extreme penalties for those who would proceed with a strike in protest. This abuse of charter rights is a warning to all Albertans that the UCP government is willing to step on our democratic rights when convenient.
This is the time that we need to heed the words John McRae wrote so long ago.

Arlene Hendrickson,
Camrose

October 21, 2025

In my recent letter to The Camrose Booster, I was wrong when I stated that the Government of Alberta fully funds students in Charter schools. I have since learned that they fund 70 per cent of what they provide to public schools, which is the highest in Canada, and is, in my view, outrageous. Some other provinces provide 35 to 50 per cent funding while Ontario and Atlantic Canada provide none. Charter schools are a business and selective in their students while also charging fees. This makes them above the reach of the average Alberta family.  We need quality education for all Alberta youth, which means more money spent on public education.

Peter Lougheed’s Conservative government believed that Albertans deserved world class public education, publicly funded health care and a natural environment protected for future generations. They believed in a commitment to the province’s welfare, integrity in public service, and that the wealth of Alberta’s oil and gas sector, through increased royalties and the Heritage Trust Fund, should sustain this quality of life for future generations. How far we have fallen.

Today’s UCP government, as evidenced by their actions, does not care about public education, public healthcare or protecting our natural environment. They do not care about the welfare of ALL Albertans and they certainly have not shown transparency or integrity in their conduct. Why are our MLAs not speaking out about the disrespect we see of constituents, teachers and support staff, healthcare workers, our youth and those moving to Alberta in the recent years?

While our Premier beats the drum for the oil and gas sector, companies are increasing production, yet there is a long-term decline in employment and further job loses in the near future. What happened to the idea of diversification of our economy? Instead of promoting pipelines, fighting with other provinces and blaming the feds while stoking separatist sentiment, perhaps the government should look at their responsibility to farmers, ranchers, manufacturing and the tourism industry. And it is people who power an economy.

Delphine J. Doerksen,
Ferintosh

October 21, 2025

The City of Camrose Council has recently stated that they have three areas of concern regarding the administration utility accounts:

a) Staff Safety, b) delinquency, and c) cost of dealing with b).

Some people are being rude and displaying inappropriate behaviour, which is totally unacceptable. However, the actual facts  to support a) and b) have not been made public.

To resolve the above, City council passed a motion to take all business and residential utility accounts and put them in the name of your landlord.

Basically, the City is blaming everyone who is a Tenant/Renter for this bad behaviour by treating everyone unfairly. You lose the independence of having your utility account in your name. You aren’t responsible anymore – your City of Camrose utility account has to be in the name of your landlord. How do you feel about not having the confidence or trust from City Hall to have a utility account in your own name?

Is the City council implying that all utility account delinquency and poor behaviour comes from Tenants/Renters only? Haven’t business and homeowners run into tough times periodically and gotten behind?

The transfer of utility accounts to landlords is simply because the City doesn’t have the procedures/policies or the personnel to carry them out. For once and for all, deal with this issue –City Hall can shut water off if it exceeds the deposit, City employees can hang up the phone if someone is rude, City employees can call the Police, or senior City employees can step up to help out at the counter if the situation warrants.

All people who object to being treated and grouped  with troublemakers should demand from City Council to pass a new motion to reinstate utility accounts for those who qualify.

Granted, the City has said account transfers will be done over time, they shouldn’t be done at all. To treat Tenants/Renters as second class citizens isn’t acceptable and is simply lazy irresponsible governance.

Perhaps greater savings could be achieved by eliminating the positions of those responsible for not having the ability and or the motivation to hold the wrong doers accountable rather than the entire Tenant/Renter population.

City Council, do the right thing – pass a new motion reinstating utility accounts and deal with your internal issue of periodic resurrection of this issue and the lack of will or ability to enforce your policy/procedure regarding the administration of utility accounts.

Mickey Mohan,
Camrose

October 14

Time to replace the Mayor and Council of City of Camrose with some better choices.

I attended Council meetings both in person and some online in the past four years. I have served on Committees of Camrose Council including Assessment Review Board, (Local and Composite), Camrose Transit Advisory, Subdivision and Development Appeal, and Council Remuneration Committee. I have a strong interest in the operation of municipalities having served as auditor, accounting advisor, and consultant to Alberta municipalities for over 30 years.

This Mayor and Council chose to not record their votes on council motions and thus the Council minutes available for the taxpayer do not have this information. I made a “promise” earlier this year, in a previous letter to The Booster, to bring this decision up during Council elections. The Councillors who supported to record voting were councillors Broker, Francoeur, and Rosland, and they deserve your vote as they represent you the taxpayer. Councillors Banack, Hoveland, Murphy voted against accountability and most definitely do not deserve your vote, as they are “hiding” all their votes. Mayor Stasko voted against the motion, and he should not have your vote.

When confronted by taxpayers, the Mayor and Council explain that it was “Council” that made the decision. With no written record of the voting, the Mayor and Councillors avoid their responsibility to explain their position to the electors. In this manner, the “administration” largely controls the discussion even before the council meeting.

Secondly, and most importantly, when you are voting, please do not be trapped into voting for the mayor and all the eight members of council and thus voting on names you only vote for based on name recognition. In my view, some members of this council are not deserving of your continuing votes (they are fine and decent people, but not suited for the roles of Council) and any new persons running could be an improvement. Please only vote for persons you know you support.

This Mayor and Council, in my opinion, have a “low” understanding of the finances and readily were maneuvered into excessive user fees, utility rates and taxes. We need better representation.

Make your votes count.

David W. Kotyk,
Camrose

October 14

On October 7, my wife and I went to the City Candidates Meet and Greet.   This is so important that we as residents of Camrose make sure that we vote in the right people for our City. I was able to have conversations with the previous and new City council members and, because of this meet and greet, which was held at the Library, I was able to have my list of whom I plan to vote for.

On October 20, please make sure to get out either to the Field House or the Mirror Lake Centre to make your vote count on who you want to see on City council and who you want as our mayor. This does affect everyone here in this City. Please take the time to vote.

Lorne Vanderwoude,
Camrose

October 14

After reading The Camrose Booster of September 30, I was disheartened to read that the City of Camrose is again resurrecting the issue of utility accounts and mistreatment of their staff. In this article, management has also tossed revenue into the mix.
Tenants/renters? Landlords? This is what the City is doing. The City is going to transfer your account for utilities into your landlord’s name. Why? Because the City has identified inappropriate behaviour towards staff that staff, at times, have found threatening and unsafe. So the City’s response is to lump all tenants/renters in the same group and label them as ones who are responsible for inappropriate behaviour.
It doesn’t matter how long you have had utilities in your name, you are one of those “tenant/renters” and are being grouped in with the troublemakers.  Tenants/renters are not second class citizens and should not be treated as such by lumping them into a group that has very negative connotations.
This same topic has come up in prior years and it is quite clear that City Hall doesn’t have an effective policy or people in place to ensure the staff are treated respectfully and to deal with those who display inappropriate behaviour.
The councillors who voted for this amendment have enacted unjustly and unfairly to the citizens who pay their utilities promptly and with respect.
This new policy applies to business as well as residential, so you are no longer good enough or responsible enough to have utilities in your name. Doesn’t matter how much pride you take in paying on time or for how long–you are now under the wing of your landlord, unless of course you own your own home–you can have utilities, however, if that same homeowner rented space for their business the landlord would have utilities in their name.
In summation, mayor and council, the citizens expect leadership, downloading the problems of some by carving out a segment of the population and labelling them the same as troublemakers is irresponsible.
The way to convey to the City that you are responsible for yourself is to make your voices heard to the mayor, councillors and City management. The City staff who have endured inappropriate behaviour have been failed miserably by everyone involved which is why we are still discussing this topic. Enough, fix it once and for all. Take responsibility.
Hold those who cause the trouble accountable. Put staff in place who are capable of enforcing policy/procedures to protect staff.

Mickey Mohan,
Camrose

October 7

A teachers’ strike seems inevitable now because of the skewed priorities, the financial incompetence and lack of integrity of our current government.

The government will pay parents $150 per student per week, and hundreds of thousands on ad campaigns instead of negotiating in good faith with the people tasked to educate our children. They fully fund students in charter schools, even though they can charge significant fees and decide which students can attend (eliminating special needs kids), something no other province does, and they don’t have money to properly fund public education? ALL Alberta children deserve a good education.

The government wasted millions of dollars on an unusable Tylenol substitute (much of it never delivered), questionable private healthcare contracts and set up a costly, top-heavy bureaucratic structure and they can’t pay for Covid vaccines? They spend millions of dollars in legal fees to fight a lawsuit alleging fraud by government insiders instead of calling a public inquiry to find out if there is substance to this challenge.
Our Premier spent millions on travel to the USA to attend the inauguration of a president who is trying to annex Canada, attending right-wing policy think tanks and her Ministers met with American politicians that have no sway in trade policy and came away with no deliverables. Then they claw back federal disability benefits and increase rents for AISH recipients.

They spent millions on an “Alberta is Calling” advertising campaign in 2022. In March of 2024, Premier Smith argued with the Federal government for a higher allotment of immigrants to help grow Alberta’s economy, yet by October, she was fighting with them once again, complaining that immigrants were putting a strain on provincial resources and housing. They are now vilifying immigrants and threatening to cut services for them.

This government has spent millions touring the province with their agenda of promoting an Alberta Pension Plan (rejected in a 2023 provincial survey), a provincial Police Force, an Alberta Tax Agency and an Alberta Immigration Agency. They have passed a law to lower the threshold for provincial referendums. The Premier declares that she wants sovereignty within a united Canada yet spends taxpayer dollars on legal fees for the separatist APP challenging Elections Alberta’s decision to have the court adjudicate the constitutionality of their referendum question. All of this sounds a lot like supporting Alberta Separation.

Delphine Doerksen,
Camrose

October 7 

The Camrose Bike Bus has been running for the last school years and it has been amazing seeing kids get excited about riding their bikes to school with friends and classmates. For those unaware of the Bike Bus, it starts at one family’s house and then rides past other kids’ houses, picking up other riders along the way to St. Pat’s. There are adults leading, often some fun music and the “vibes are immaculate.” However, the number of Camrosians in vehicles who have shown impatience or general disdain towards the riders is unbelievable.

Bikes are an incredible tool and relatively inexpensive form of accessible transportation. The Bike Bus provides a fun and engaging way to empower kids to get out and exercise while getting themselves to school. We hear too much about how “kids these days” can’t, won’t or don’t do any number of things, yet when provided an option of transportation that has been available for generations, we honk at these kids and wave them to hurry up. Drivers are able to sit in climate controlled bubbles with music and a morning coffee yet are unable to appreciate kids having safe, fun transportation because they cost us two minutes on a commute.

So the next time you’re angry at kids having fun getting to school, take a deep breath, maybe sip that coffee and offer a friendly smile and wave. Next time you too could ride your bike to work and have as much fun as they are. The kids are all right.

Cole Boyd,
Camrose